Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 01:13
Just in the last 5 years:
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Charting the Global Economy: US GDP Falls on Larger Trade Hit - Bloomberg
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Google AI Mode traffic data added to Search Console reporting - Search Engine Land
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
The dancing monk: Why mature people don’t chase total control - Big Think
Thank you.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Two space vets added to Astronaut Hall of Fame as one awaits launch - collectSPACE.com
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
LSU baseball vs. UCLA game suspended on Monday night. Here's when it will resume - NOLA.com
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Why do so many people find Kakashi's character so appealing and inspirational?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What’s next?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What are some very specific groups of people you just cannot stand?